Proximity to Golf Courses and Risk of Parkinson Disease
A case-control study found the greatest risk of PD within 1 to 3 miles of a golf course, and that this risk generally decreased with distance.
Static snapshot — vote, comment, and submit papers on the live app.
Open in Live App →- Tested in Humans
Proximity to Golf Courses and Risk of Parkinson Disease
Published 2025Reviewer Insight6/5/2026This observational study found that people living near golf courses, especially those whose tap water comes from groundwater in the same area as a golf course, had significantly higher rates of Parkinson disease. The association was strongest through the drinking water pathway, where people in vulnerable groundwater zones with a nearby golf course had roughly double the odds of developing PD.
From a statistical rigor perspective, the study had several issues related to analysis, for example:
- No multiple-comparison correction was applied across ~8 simultaneous hypothesis tests, meaning the headline distance-band result (< 1 mile, p = .03) and the 2–3 mile band (p = .03) both fail Bonferroni (threshold ≈ 0.006), so the categorical distance findings — the most publicly legible part of the paper — are not statistically defensible as reported.
- The 20:1 case-to-control matching ratio creates a massive urban/rural imbalance (80% urban cases vs. 30% urban controls) that logistic regression adjustment cannot reliably correct when the covariate distribution is this asymmetric — a propensity-score trimmed or restricted analysis would have been far more credible.
- Distance to a golf course as of 2013 is used as a proxy for pesticide exposure occurring potentially decades earlier, with no validation against actual environmental monitoring, pesticide application records, or biological samples — the exposure metric is essentially untested.
- Income imbalance between cases and controls ($63,400 vs. $55,600 median) is never formally tested as an effect modifier
Snapshot built: 2026-06-19